Saturday, 27 June 2009
Science must be coupled with gratefulness, not arrogance
Tuesday, 23 June 2009
Arts and crafts
Saturday, 20 June 2009
Karađoz-Begova Džamija
Tuesday, 16 June 2009
Symbols often speak out loud
Now that we have crossed, we started counting. Slowly but steadily, the number of women in hijab that passed us escalated. Even the mosques sound a bit more lively than the one on the other side- there were evidence of them being used, and are still in use; the provisional sandals were in a disarray, and its floors were wet. Plus, one cannot walk for more than 5 minutes without bumping into another mosque- that is just not possible on this side of the spiritually-divided Mostar. And if you're thinking of it, no, they don't have alcohol-selling bars attached to them. Thankfully.
However funny it may sound, all over the world Muslims and Islam are judged by its symbols; hijab, mosques, and occassionally beards. This fact is almost always true, and is a case unescapable to many, including myself. More often than not, our idea of 'the extent of which Islam is practiced' in a particular area is derived from juggling these two or three factors. A friend who has visited a city in Turkey recently concluded that it is not very Islamic, because he saw very few mosques (and mosque-goers), downplaying the presence of many women in hijab there. Whether his remark was accurate or not is an altogether different matter, what bears weight here is the fact that mosques and hijab tend to have the upper hand in this particular conscience of ours. Some points need pondering: Is this method always valid? Or is it only used as a preliminary and immature measure, often favoured by judgmental toursists? Is there a better way of gauging such a delicate matter? This could be a favourite research question for those involved in social sciences.
We continued walking, wide-eyed, capturing every scene of the now Islamic environment into our memories. There was a man, presumably an imam, in their typical 'clergical' dark robe and had a high hat, in red, walking a few metres from us. Unfortunately I wasn't brave enough at that time to start a conversation with a completely random Bosnian stranger. I could be just another tourist to them. Was I not?
Saturday, 13 June 2009
Mosque-bar cohesion
We did brave ourselves to walk into the mosque's compound, despite a thousand pairs of eyes staring at us when we were opening its rusted doorgate. Unsurprisingly, it looked deserted. The fountain wasn't giving out any water, there were rolled rags scattering at the mosque's front door, and its windows were so dusty that we couldn't see through them. The imam's grave lying at a corner of its compound added to its gloominess- maybe this mosque, the Lakišića Džamija, died along with his death. I tried the door, and- needless to say- it was locked. We had no choice but to walk out in dissapointment.
No hijab, no actual mosque, and yes bars- what else can this tell us about the growth and popularity of Islam in Bosna, or at least here in Mostar? For us travelers who specifically look for one, it was a big blow to take. The whole situation was harder to accept especially if you knew that in the pre-Tito era, the streets of Mostar were filled with muslim women in niqab, the face covering. Tito came and saw Islam as a threat, so almost nothing was spared. When mosque-incapacitating was deemed not totally effective, muslim dress was banned, forcing the women to turn their own houses into jails. Countless of them were sentenced for life, and many died not seeing much of the sun. However cruel it sounds to us now, it surely has served its purpose as far as Tito was concerned. With these approaches he succesfully curbed Islamic learning, propagation, and soon after, identity. When the new generation was born, Islam was no longer a familiarity.
Tuesday, 9 June 2009
Product of the past
Glancing to our left, the road sloped slightly down the hilly contours of Mostar, leading to a more conservative side of the town. Standing- or actually crumbling- at its forefront was a building, or what remained of it, with obvious destructions from shellings. 15 years and the scar is still visible- this, really, is something to be astonished about. I know some people who came here in 2004; they described all the fallen infrastructures in Mostar even then- but mind you, this is 2009! However, it seemed to receive no attention from the people driving and walking around it, as if it was never there. Perhaps the mighty Katedrala and a vibrant Gimnazija (high school) masked its sheer existence- together with the history it brings, the memory it may sustain, and the emotions it may evoke. Maybe, like Sarđan, they want to forget the past. Or maybe they simply don't want people to remember anything about it anymore. They want their atrocities to be left unchecked, unchastised.
Whatever was the case, it has helped us to decide on our next steps. It happened almost naturally; we were in Bosna not so much to worship the modernity, but to mull over its prized antiquity. We took to the narrow street, closed on both sides by rows of buildings, old and new. Before we could go any further, an image of a building came to our delighted sights- a mosque. It wasn't huge, but still I had all this imagination of praying in this first mosque we've been to in the whole of Bosna i Hercegovina. My brain started to come out with plans; if we want to pray a proper peaceful zuhr prayer, wherever we are by then, we have to make it back here. I mean why should I pray in the streets, in a country like Bosna?
As we walked closer to this dream, we saw the most disturbing phenomenon one could ever see. Oh no, there goes our plan, shattered to pieces. And I mean very small pieces.
Saturday, 6 June 2009
Yesterday's massacres, today's divisions
In Malaysia, there are countless women walking around with hijab, yet we never have really appreciated it- at least not until we were sent to study here in the Europe. The case is not unlike of mosques, which we might take for granted for all these years- but I cried so profusely when I first found a mosque in my early days of studying here. Somehow the taste of Islam gives us serenity in our hearts; it soothes our eyes and gives us a new breath. I now know why I am always so delighted to go to London- not because of its fame or diversity per se, but the many muslim women in hijab and lively mosques that one can rarely find in other metropolitan cities. It feels warm and safe. Above all, it's a source of peace, and that is as far as words can describe.
The opposite remains true; here in the streets of Mostar we didn't- and couldn't- feel safe. We felt at lost, and we were lost. While looking for the grand Old Bridge, we secretly hoped to find these Islamic signatures manifest in hijab and mosques. Mind you, there wasn't even a sign of a single mosque then. The first one I saw was miles away, at the peripheries of the city, when we were still in the bus. Confused, we tried to reason out the situation. It's not surprising at all to find that the answer lies in its bloody history..
The Balkans were a single unified country before Yugoslavia broke in the end of 20th Century, consisting of Croatia, Bosna i Hercegovina, Serbia, Slovenia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Kosova and Vojvodina. After Tito's death, the Serbs tried to take control of the whole bunch of Republics, only to be confronted by secessions initially from Slovenia and Croatia. Insulted, the Serbs, who inherited most of the powerful JNA (Yugoslavian National Army) waged wars with these two whom they forced to remain as Yugoslavian Republics, but both assaults ended prematurely. It is extremely stupefying to learn that as part of the peace process, the Karađorđevo agreement was made between Slobodan Milošević and Franjo Tuđman in which they agreed to partition and share Bosna as they would a cake. Their brainless action was in every way similar to two men stealing and devouring another man's birthday cake, when shamefully they were not even invited to the party!
Bosna was soon attacked from both sides- from the very neighbours that they thought mutual relations can be peacefully maintined. Understandably Bosna was furious, but they had literally nothing- neither arms nor real army to resist. And yet brutal occupations and heartless massacres took place every so often. In fact, from within Bosna, the Bosnian Croats and Serbs in general overwhelmingly sided to the aggressors, which resulted in sheer disaster. Within towns polices turned against each other. Within villages neighbours burned their houses down. The war seemed to be external, between countries, but not even the streets where they lived were any longer safe.
Although Ahmići massacre was most atrocious, the siege of Mostar accorded more publicity in the history of Croatian offensive on Bosna. Roughly, its east region was fiercely defended by both the army of Bosna and the inhabitants of Mostar from the continuous assaults of their enemy from the west. There was even a road, which appeared to me like a motorway, that historically demarcates these territories until today. The defending party, with Allah's help, managed to stop the enemy advances and land incursions, but in 1993 the unsatisfied Croats resorted to shelling down the invaluable Old Bridge until its fall in November the 9th of the same year.
No wonder, we were still in the 'enemy territory'; a term that would become increasingly used as I continued my journey. At least now I'm satisfied, that I've got an explanation. Possibly..